Fortune has reported that managers are being asked to adopt a new core skill: leading AI agents and bots, whose outputs they will be accountable for in increasingly automated organisations as AI adoption accelerates globally. The article argues that leadership now includes orchestrating multiple models, assigning tasks, and reviewing outputs much like managing a team, with stakes heightened by hallucinations and the need for technical fluency. Citing Microsoft’s 2025 Work Trend Index and CEO sentiment, it notes leaders expect managing AI systems to fall within scope within five years, reframing management as stewardship of “digital workers.”

Context and Background

Authored for Fortune, the piece frames the shift as a practical leadership evolution: managers must choose the right model for the job, define roles, and structure workflows that blend human oversight with agent autonomy. It highlights a convergence with established team practices—clarifying expectations, iterative feedback, and trust‑but‑verify routines—while contrasting the absence of human dynamics like psychological safety with the need for explicit coordination. Research references include Harvard work linking coordination of AI agents to human team leadership, alongside Microsoft’s “agent boss” concept and calls for onboarding AIs like new hires.

Concrete skills outlined include five pillars: team composition and role clarity, task delegation via precise prompting, performance monitoring with iterative refinement (including AI‑on‑AI review), trust calibration to prevent unsupervised drift, and ethical oversight to align outputs with organisational values. Fortune further cites NVIDIA’s Jensen Huang, projecting enterprises with tens of thousands of humans and millions of AI agents, underscoring the scale and urgency of leadership readiness. Syndicated coverage from AOL mirrors these points, reinforcing the leadership toolkit and accountability implications.

Looking Forward

The implications are immediate: leadership development programmes will need to incorporate prompt engineering, model capability mapping, and governance protocols, preparing managers to act as conductors of non‑human workforces rather than solely people leaders. Organisations in the UK and beyond could optimise productivity by codifying agent onboarding, guardrails, and audit trails, aligning with broader enterprise AI rollouts and talent upskilling agendas. As firms pilot agentic workflows, expect clearer roles between human oversight and automated execution, with verification gates for high‑risk tasks becoming standard practice.

Stakeholder perspectives suggest that whilst AI expands leaders’ capacity, it also heightens accountability—bad goals and unchecked hallucinations will surface as operational risk with human owners on the hook. With Microsoft’s trend data signalling near‑term responsibility shifts, competitive advantage will accrue to organisations that realise leadership is now a socio‑technical craft spanning psychology, ethics, and systems engineering.

Source Attribution:

Share this article