Bloomsbury CEO Says AI Will Help Authors Overcome Writer’s Block

TL;DR: Bloomsbury founder and chief executive Nigel Newton argues AI will support creative arts by helping authors overcome writer’s block, enabling initial drafts that get creators “back in the zone.” However, he maintains prominent writers will retain irreplaceable value due to readers’ preference for authoritative brand names.

The chief executive of Bloomsbury, the publisher behind the Harry Potter series, has positioned artificial intelligence as a creativity enabler that will help authors overcome initial writing barriers whilst maintaining that prominent writers remain irreplaceable.

AI’s Role in Creative Process

Nigel Newton, who founded Bloomsbury in 1986 and signed JK Rowling in the 1990s, outlined his vision for AI’s impact on creative arts in comments to PA news agency:

“I think AI will probably help creativity, because it will enable the 8 billion people on the planet to get started on some creative area where they might have hesitated to take the first step. AI gets them going and writes the first paragraph, or first chapter, and gets them back in the zone.”

Newton extended this assessment beyond writing to “almost all of the creative arts,” including painting and music composition, suggesting AI tools lower barriers to creative expression across disciplines.

Limits of AI Content Generation

Whilst embracing AI as a creative aid, Newton identified concerns about fully AI-generated books:

“We are programmed deep in our DNA to be comforted by the authority and the reliability of big brand names, and that applies more than ever to the names of big writers. There will be some shoddy content out there so people will turn increasingly to sources of authority for reassurance.”

This positioning suggests a tiered content landscape where AI-generated “shoddy content” drives readers toward established authors and trusted publishers—a dynamic potentially beneficial to Bloomsbury’s business model centred on prominent writers.

Bloomsbury’s Financial Position

Newton’s comments came shortly after Bloomsbury experienced a 10% single-day share price rise following financial results showing:

Academic and Professional Division:

  • 20% revenue increase in first half of financial year
  • Growth largely attributed to AI licensing agreement
  • Division capitalising on AI training data demand

Consumer Division:

  • 20% revenue decline
  • Attributed to absence of new Sarah J Maas title
  • Highlights reliance on high-profile author releases

The financial results demonstrate Bloomsbury simultaneously benefits from AI licensing revenue whilst maintaining traditional publishing operations dependent on celebrity authors.

Author Portfolio Strategy

Bloomsbury’s recent sales growth stems from high-profile authors including fantasy writer Sarah J Maas, whose “romantasy” series A Court of Thorns and Roses has sold over 70 million English-language copies globally. Maas’s popularity, amplified through TikTok, exemplifies the “big brand names” Newton argues AI cannot replace.

The publisher, headquartered in London with approximately 1,000 employees, maintains its business model around marquee authors whilst exploring AI-related revenue through licensing agreements.

Industry Tensions

Newton’s optimistic AI positioning contrasts with ongoing conflicts between authors and AI companies. In September 2025, Anthropic agreed to pay $1.5 billion (£1.1 billion) to settle a US class action lawsuit from book authors arguing the company used pirated copies of their works for chatbot training.

This settlement highlights friction between publishers potentially benefiting from AI licensing agreements and authors whose copyrighted works may be used without compensation or consent for AI model training.

Looking Forward

Newton’s framework suggests a publishing landscape where:

  1. AI democratises creative initiation - Lowering barriers for billions to begin creative projects
  2. Quality differentiation increases - Readers gravitate toward established authors amidst AI-generated content proliferation
  3. Publishers occupy middle ground - Benefiting from AI licensing revenue whilst maintaining traditional author-centric business models
  4. Brand authority appreciates - Established writers’ value increases relative to AI-generated alternatives

Critical Questions:

Author Compensation: How do licensing agreements distribute revenue to authors whose works train AI models that may compete with their output?

Quality Assessment: Will readers reliably distinguish between AI-assisted writing by human authors and fully AI-generated content as technology improves?

Creative Authenticity: Does AI assistance fundamentally alter the nature of creative authorship, or simply represent another tool in the writer’s arsenal?

Market Dynamics: If AI enables mass content creation whilst driving readers toward “big brand names,” does this further concentrate publishing industry power and marginalise emerging voices?

Newton’s characterisation of AI as creativity enabler rather than replacement reflects a publishing executive’s perspective—one that may differ substantially from working authors’ experiences, particularly those without established platforms navigating an increasingly AI-augmented content landscape.

The tension between embracing AI tools for market advantage whilst maintaining traditional author-dependent revenue models represents a defining challenge for publishers navigating this technological transition.

Source Attribution:

Share this article