The Rise of the AI Accountant: Cheaper. Faster. Riskier?

TL;DR: The UK enters its first AI-led tax season with 59% of Self Assessment filers planning to use AI tools. Whilst speed, convenience, and cost drive adoption, accountants warn that 73% of AI advice is incomplete, 62% struggles with nuance, and 52% lacks UK-specific tax knowledge—creating costly error risks.

A Taxfix survey reveals UK taxpayers are embracing AI for Self Assessment returns ahead of HMRC’s 31 January deadline. Oli Harcourt, Senior Director at Taxfix, examines the opportunities and risks as generic AI tools meet highly technical, compliance-driven tax requirements.

Context and Background

Tax returns’ notorious complexity, combined with high street accountant fees (£300-£500 for simple returns) and HMRC’s poor customer service, drives AI adoption. Respondents cite speed (39%), convenience (36%), and cost (33%) as primary motivations, with 79% reporting reduced stress and anxiety.

OpenAI’s largest-ever consumer AI study analysing 1.5 million conversations found 49% now use ChatGPT primarily as an advisor rather than task executor. This behavioural shift extends beyond tax—nearly half (43%) of Self Assessment filers now research tax tips on TikTok and YouTube.

Generational divides emerge: 58% of 18-24 year-olds prefer TikTok and YouTube over HMRC (36%), whilst 67% of 55-64 year-olds trust HMRC compared to just 10% using social media sources.

The Reality of AI Tax Advice

Despite enthusiasm, technical limitations create serious risks. Accountants surveyed report:

  • 73% believe AI provides incomplete advice
  • 62% say it struggles with nuance
  • 52% point to lack of UK-specific tax knowledge

Users without technical training often don’t know which details to provide or follow-up questions to ask, leading to incorrect judgements about allowances, reliefs, and reporting obligations. These mistakes accumulate into costly penalties or unclaimed eligible tax refunds.

Real-world example: A Taxfix client incorrectly applied the £1,000 trading allowance instead of claiming actual expenses. Because their income placed them in the 60% tax trap, this error would have cost thousands—human oversight saved significant money.

Impact on the Accounting Profession

AI creates dual impacts for accountants:

Internal productivity boost: Accountants delegate manual work—document management, data extraction, anomaly detection, translating technical rules into plain English—to AI, allowing focus on higher-value client services.

Client relationship transformation: Taxpayers increasingly arrive with AI-fuelled assumptions, convinced they already know what returns should contain. Accountants must validate, explain, and correct AI-informed inputs—demanding both technical expertise and clear communication skills.

This dynamic shift requires accountants to evolve from pure number-crunchers to interpreters and quality-controllers of AI-generated work.

The Hybrid Future

Despite AI’s appeal, 81% of respondents still want access to qualified professionals when needed. This creates opportunity for accountants who adopt AI internally to deliver efficiency clients expect whilst providing human reassurance where complexity demands it.

The winning formula: AI where it excels (speed, data processing, routine tasks), human oversight where required (nuance, compliance verification, strategic advice).

Looking Forward

As the first AI-led UK tax season unfolds, the accountancy profession faces transformation rather than replacement. Success requires embracing AI’s productivity benefits whilst recognising where human expertise remains irreplaceable.

For taxpayers, the message is clear: AI tools offer accessibility and convenience, but tax complexity demands professional verification to avoid costly errors. The future of tax filing isn’t AI versus humans—it’s AI augmenting human expertise.

Source Attribution:

Share this article