OpenAI’s Atlas Browser: Built-In ChatGPT Features Fail to Justify Switch

TL;DR: MIT Technology Review’s hands-on testing of OpenAI’s new Atlas browser reveals disappointing AI agent performance and limited utility for integrated ChatGPT features. The review concludes Atlas primarily serves OpenAI’s data collection interests rather than providing meaningful advantages to users over established browsers.

OpenAI launched Atlas, a web browser with integrated ChatGPT and AI agent capabilities, positioning it as a unified platform for browsing, direct AI answers, and automated task execution. Multi-day real-world testing by MIT Technology Review’s Mat Honan revealed significant gaps between Atlas’s promise and practical performance.

Core Features and Positioning

Atlas differentiates itself through two primary capabilities:

  1. Integrated ChatGPT: Direct access to OpenAI’s chatbot within the browser interface
  2. AI Agent Functionality: Automated task execution on users’ behalf during browsing sessions

OpenAI markets Atlas aggressively through ChatGPT, encouraging downloads with prominent placement. However, the review questions whether these features provide sufficient value to justify switching from entrenched browsers like Chrome or Safari.

Agent Performance Testing

Amazon Shopping Task

The reviewer tested Atlas’s agent using the browser’s own suggested prompt: “Start a cart with items I’m likely to want based on my browsing here and highlight any active promo codes. Let me review before checkout.”

Agent Performance:

  • Processing time: Approximately 10 minutes
  • Selected a notebook the user had recently purchased (no longer needed)
  • Added deodorant the user had recently purchased (no longer needed)
  • Included an expensive vacuum cleaner the user had previously rejected (purchased cheaper alternative)
  • Failed to identify any items the user actually wanted

Facebook Status Generation

When asked to create a Facebook status update, the agent analysed browser history and generated an “incredibly long” post. The reviewer shared select excerpts:

“I dipped into Smartsheet and TeamSnap (because editors juggle rosters too!), flirted with Shopify and Amazon (holiday gift-shopping? side hustle? you decide), and kept tabs on the news… Somewhere in there I even remembered to log into Slack, schedule Zoom meetings, and read a few NYTimes and Technology Review pieces. Who says an editor’s life isn’t glamorous? 😊”

The user declined to post this content, characterising the other generated examples as “equally unillustrious.”

Integrated ChatGPT Limitations

The review highlighted a critical failure in the integrated ChatGPT functionality. When asked to summarise an MIT Technology Review article the reviewer was currently reading, ChatGPT referenced the previous page from earlier in the session instead of the active page.

This error—generating “useless nonsense” rather than relevant content—undermines the core value proposition of having ChatGPT integrated directly into the browsing experience. The reviewer noted no obvious utility advantage over simply visiting chatgpt.com in a separate tab.

Data Collection Concerns

The review’s most pointed criticism addresses Atlas’s true purpose:

“It’s been hard for me to understand why Atlas exists. Who is this browser for, exactly? Who is its customer? And the answer I have come to there is that Atlas is for OpenAI. The real customer, the true end user of Atlas, is not the person browsing websites, it is the company collecting data about what and how that person is browsing.”

This characterisation frames Atlas as “cynicism masquerading as software”—a browser whose primary function serves OpenAI’s data collection needs rather than providing genuine utility to users.

Market Position and Adoption Challenges

Despite aggressive marketing through ChatGPT placement, Atlas faces significant adoption barriers:

Established Competition:

  • Chrome and Safari possess entrenched user bases
  • Strong brand loyalty to existing browsers
  • Extensive extension ecosystems unavailable in Atlas
  • Years of refinement in performance and features

Insufficient Differentiation: Atlas’s AI features must provide compelling advantages to justify switching costs. The review suggests these features fail to meet that threshold, particularly given their underwhelming performance in practical testing.

Looking Forward

The review positions Atlas as an “empty salvo in the new browser wars” —a product that may generate downloads through promotional placement but lacks substantive reasons for sustained adoption.

Key Challenges for Atlas:

  1. Agent Reliability: Demonstrated poor judgment in shopping recommendations and content generation
  2. Integration Value: Built-in ChatGPT showed no clear advantage over standalone access
  3. Functionality Gaps: Basic features like context awareness failed in testing
  4. Privacy Implications: Data collection focus raises trust concerns

The characterisation of Atlas as serving OpenAI’s interests over users’ represents a fundamental trust deficit. For a browser—a tool handling sensitive browsing data—this positioning creates significant adoption friction.

This review adds to growing scrutiny of AI product releases that appear driven by competitive positioning or data acquisition strategies rather than genuine user needs. As AI companies race to integrate their technologies into established product categories, Atlas exemplifies the risk of launching before core functionality delivers meaningful advantages.

Source Attribution:

Share this article